Our Member, Dr Meltem Ineli Ciger, Associate Professor of International Law, Suleyman Demirel University, has published a new post blog on EU Law Analysis, titled “Misreading the Temporary Protection Directive? The CJEU sets the record straight on access to subsidiary protection in Framholm (C-195/25)”.
In the blog post, she analysed the judgment of the European Court of Justice issued on 20 November 2025 regarding the interpretation of the Temporary Protection Directive.
The main question asked was whether EU law really permits a Member State to deny access to subsidiary protection solely because the applicant already enjoys temporary protection. The Court’s answer is unequivocal: No.
..but there is more! To read the complete analysis, click here.
The analysed judgment is the third one concerning the interpretation of the Temporary Protection, if you have missed the other ones:
1) Joined cases C-244/24 and C-290/24 Kaduna -> Dr Meltem Ineli Ciger anlisis here
2) Case C‑753/23 (Krasiliva). -> Dr Meltem Ineli Ciger anlisis here.
